首页> 外文OA文献 >Comparison of serial casting and stretching technique in children with congenital idiopathic clubfoot: Evaluation of a new assessment system.
【2h】

Comparison of serial casting and stretching technique in children with congenital idiopathic clubfoot: Evaluation of a new assessment system.

机译:先天性特发性马蹄足患儿连续铸造和拉伸技术的比较:一种新的评估系统的评价。

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Background and purpose The outcome of clubfoot treatment is the result of several factors such as severity, type of treatment, and measurement instruments. We compared two intervention groups with two assessment procedures. Patients and methods 16 children were treated consecutively with intensive stretching according to the Copenhagen method and 16 children consecutively with casting according to the Ponseti technique, during their first 2 months of age. The need for surgery was then assessed. At 4 months of age, all children used a dynamic Knee Ankle Foot Orthosis. The Clubfoot Assessment Protocol (CAP) and the Dimeglio Classification System (DCS) were used and compared during treatment and at 2 years of age. Results According to the CAP (but not the DCS) the casting technique was superior in clubfoot correction, apparent as better mobility and better quality of motion at 2 years of age. These children also required less surgery. The orthotics management functioned well in both groups, with high compliance and maintenance or slight improvement of the clinical status except for morphology. DCS score changed over time but not between the groups. Because of its multidimensional and narrower scoring interval construct, the CAP enabled us to elucidate and evaluate different clinical functions. Interpretation The casting technique according to Ponseti seems to be the better of the two for clubfoot correction, regarding mobility and quality of motion. The Clubfoot Assessment Protocol (but not the Dimeglio Classification System) was able to reveal differences between the Copenhagen and Ponseti treatment methods.
机译:背景和目的马蹄足治疗的结果是多种因素的结果,例如严重程度,治疗类型和测量仪器。我们将两个干预组与两个评估程序进行了比较。患者和方法在他们的头2个月大时,按照哥本哈根方法连续对16名儿童进行了强力拉伸治疗,根据庞塞迪技术对16名儿童进行了连铸治疗。然后评估是否需要手术。在4个月大时,所有儿童均进行了动态膝踝足矫形器。在治疗期间和2岁时使用并比较了马蹄足评估协议(CAP)和Dimeglio分类系统(DCS)。结果根据CAP(但不是DCS),铸造技术在马蹄内翻足矫正方面表现出众,在2岁时表现出更好的活动性和更好的运动质量。这些孩子也需要较少的手术。矫形器管理在两组中均表现良好,除了形态学外,均具有较高的依从性和维持性或临床状况略有改善。 DCS分数随时间变化,但两组之间没有变化。由于其多维性和较窄的评分间隔结构,CAP使我们能够阐明和评估不同的临床功能。解释在活动性和运动质量方面,Ponseti的铸造技术似乎是两者中较好的一种,用于矫正马蹄内翻足。马蹄内翻足评估协议(但不是Dimeglio分类系统)能够揭示哥本哈根和庞塞迪治疗方法之间的差异。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号